User agent detail

MOT-SAP4_/11.03 UP.Browser/4.1.23c
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaSAP4_ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA MotorolaSAP4Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-SAP4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.23cclose MotorolaV66mobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaSAP4smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.23close MotorolaSAP4_closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.23c closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.489 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 MotorolaSAP4mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaV66Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:52 | by ThaDafinser