User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-C3262 Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/7.0.30281/34.1000; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Opera Mini 7.0JAVA unknown2.2 SamsungGT-C3262Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.0Presto 2.2JAVA SamsungGT-C3262Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.0.30281closeJVM SamsungGT-C3262mobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.0Presto SamsungGT-C3262smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.0.30281close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.0.30281close SamsungGT-C3262closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.0.30281close closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.0.30281Presto 2.8.119 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.0Presto 2.8.119Touchwiz SamsungChamp Neo Duosmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:52 | by ThaDafinser