User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux;Android 4.0.4; Digma iDsD7 3G Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36(KHTML,like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-529.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.0unknown DigmaiDsD7 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.0DigmaiDsD7 3GTabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.0.4Digma iDsD7 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.0.4DigmaiDsD7tabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:51 | by ThaDafinser