User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.8.0.11) Firefox/1.5.0.11;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.8.0.11closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 1.5Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 1.5.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 1.5.0.11 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 1.5.0.11 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeWindows XPNovarraCTS reformatting proxyOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:51 | by ThaDafinser