User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; iDxD7 3G Build/ICS) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.74 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1764.89981
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 28.0Android 4.0unknown DigmaiDxD7 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.0DigmaiDxD7 3GTabletyesyes0.075 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1764.89981closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 28.0.1764.89981closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.0yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1764.89981closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1764closeAndroid 4.0.3iDxD7 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 28.0.1764.89981WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.0.3DigmaiDxD7tabletyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1764.89981closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:50 | by ThaDafinser