User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ar-SA) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/3.11546IP
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 3.0iOS unknownunknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 3.0WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 3.11546closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 3.11546WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 3.11546closeLinux AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 3.11546WebKit 534.35 iPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 3Webkit 534.35iOS iPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:50 | by ThaDafinser