User agent detail

semanticdiscovery/0.2(http://www.semanticdiscovery.com/sd/robot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
semanticdiscovery 0.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSemantic DiscoveryBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
semanticdiscovery 0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyessemanticdiscoveryclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyessemanticdiscoveryCrawler0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:49 | by ThaDafinser