User agent detail

BrightSign/5.1.52 (SV-4K-ROW) Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Linux mips) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/18.0.1025.168 Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/537.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/signage/other.yaml
BrightSign 5.1.52 Webkit 537.4BrightSignSV-4K-ROWsignage Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 18.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 18.0.1025closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 18.0.1025.168WebKit 537.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
BrightSign 5.1.52Webkit 537.4 BrightSignSV-4K-ROWsignagecloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:49 | by ThaDafinser