User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Nokia6233) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.377 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.4Series40 Gecko Nokia6233mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close Nokia6233mobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Symbian Nokia6233smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1close Nokia6233closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.132 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.377 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6233closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Series40 Nokia6233mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close Nokia6233Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:48 | by ThaDafinser