User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ImPAD 2113 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.131 YaBrowser/14.5.1847.18211.00 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ImpressionImPAD 2113 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847.18211.00closeAndroid 4.1.1ImPAD 2113mobile-browseryescloseclose0.279 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.1yes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.5.1847.18211.00closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847closeAndroid 4.1.1ImpressionImPAD 2113closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847.18211.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.1.1ImPAD 2113mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:48 | by ThaDafinser