User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; G79 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Safari/537.36 OPR/27.0.1698.89115
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Opera Mobile 27.0Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 27.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 27.0.1698.89115closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 27.0.1698.89115closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 27.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 27.0.1698.89115closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 27.0.1698closeAndroid 4.2.2G79closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 27.0.1698.89115WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 27.0Blink Android 4.2.2G79tabletyescloseclose0.09801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 27.0.1698.89115closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.066 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:47 | by ThaDafinser