User agent detail

Xda_diamond Opera/9.50 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.50Windows Mobile O2XDA Diamondmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.50Presto 2.2 HTCTouch DiamondMobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.50closeWindows Mobile O2XDA Diamondmobile-browseryescloseclose0.178 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows XPO2Xda diamondsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile O2XDA Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close O2XDA DiamondFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:47 | by ThaDafinser