User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android RCMix_v2.2_WWE; de-de; HTC_HERO Build/ERE27) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCHERO Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2HTCHeroMobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.275 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCHEROsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid HTCHEROcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1HTCHeromobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:47 | by ThaDafinser