User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.2; Win64; x64; U; Edition Next; xx) Presto/2.10.289 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 12.00Windows Server 2003Presto 2.10.289desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.00Presto Windows Server 2003desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.289Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.527 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.00Presto 2.10.289Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:47 | by ThaDafinser