User agent detail

WhatsApp/2.11.282 WP7/7.10.8862 Device/SAMSUNG-OMNIA7-H3.15.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungOMNIA7-H3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
WhatsApp 2.11.282closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SamsungOMNIA7-H3.15.0.4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WhatsApp 2.11 SamsungOMNIA7-H3smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungOMNIA7-H3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WhatsApp 2.11 Windows Phone 7.10SamsungOmnia 7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:46 | by ThaDafinser