User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Hudl 2 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 30.0.0.0Android 4.4.2Blink TescoHudl 2tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2TescoHudl 2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.276 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.4TescoHudl 2tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2Hudl 2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 30Blink Android 4.4.2TescoHudl 2tabletyescloseclose0.05401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4TescoHudl 2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:46 | by ThaDafinser