User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3XXR_J/97.04.30R BER2.2 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; 13003290) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera 8.60 [en] UP.Link/6.3.1.17.06.3.1.17.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaRAZRV3XXR_J Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 8.60Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60close desktop-browsercloseclose0.224 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto MotorolaRAZRV3XXRsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.3.1.17.06.3.1.17.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60close MotorolaRAZRV3XXR_Jcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini MotorolaRAZRV3XXRmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xxRFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:45 | by ThaDafinser