User agent detail

MOT-F5/4.1.9 UP.Browser/4.1.23c
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaF5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaF5Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-F5 4.1.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.23cclose MotorolaT193mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaF5smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.23close MotorolaF5closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.23c closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.363 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 MotorolaF5mobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaT193Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:45 | by ThaDafinser