User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 Iceweasel/35.0a2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Iceweasel 35.0Linux unknown35.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 35.0Gecko 35.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 35.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 35.0a2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 35.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 35.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 35.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 35.0a2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 35.0a2Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 35.0Gecko 35.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 35.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 35.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:45 | by ThaDafinser