User agent detail

Lenovo-A60/S100 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/2.3.3 Release/04.19.2011 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Profile/ Configuration/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA60 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo-A60 S100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3LenovoA60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA60smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.3LenovoA60closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.3LenovoA60mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA60Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.056 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:44 | by ThaDafinser