User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; en; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 Opera 11.64
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 4.0GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 4.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.64closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.64closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.64closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 4.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.64Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:44 | by ThaDafinser