User agent detail

MOT-V9mm/00.62 UP.Browser/6.2.3.4.c.1.123 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaV9mmmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V9mm 00.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.4.c.1.123close MotorolaMOTORAZR V9Mmobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 MotorolaV9mmsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close MotorolaV9mmcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.2.3.4.c.1.123 MotorolaMotorola V9mmcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaV9mmmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaMOTORAZR V9MFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:44 | by ThaDafinser