User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Haiku R1 x86) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) QupZilla/1.7.0 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
QupZilla 1.7.0Haiku Webkit 538.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QupZilla 1.7.0closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac desktop0.019 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QupZilla 1.7.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QupZilla 1.7.0WebKit 538.1Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.432 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QupZilla 1.7.0Webkit 538.1Haiku desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:43 | by ThaDafinser