User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; AOL 9.5; AOLBuild 4337.156; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/8.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
IE 12.0Win8 6.28.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 12.0Trident 8.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.072 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AOL Explorer 9.5closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AOL 9.5.4337closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
AOL 9.5closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 8.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AOL Desktop 9.5Trident 8.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:43 | by ThaDafinser