User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Series60/2.6 Nokia6630/3.45.111 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6630 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.058 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Symbian OS Series 60 2.6Nokia6630smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 2.6close Nokia6630closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6630closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 2.6Nokia6630mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 2.6Nokia6630Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:41 | by ThaDafinser