User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.6) PPC; 240x320; HTC P3450 White; OpVer 23.227.1.801
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP3450 White Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.6Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows HTCP3450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.6Trident Windows CE HTCP3450 Whitesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows CE HTCP3450 Whitecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.1HTCP3450mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCP3450Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:41 | by ThaDafinser