User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Ex-Crawler/v0.1.5ALPHA SVN rev58; powered by ex-crawler; +http://www.ex-crawler.de/) Java/1.6.0_20,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Ex-Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.134 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.006 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesEx-Crawlerclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:40 | by ThaDafinser