User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (en-us) AppleWebKit/534.14 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Wireless Transcoder) Chrome/9.0.597 Safari/534.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-130.php
yesGoogle Wireless TranscoderBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Wireless TranscoderBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 9.0.597closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGoogle Wireless Transcoderclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 9.0.597close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 9.0.597close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 9.0.597close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 9.0.597WebKit 534.14 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Wireless Transcoderclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Mobile Transcoder Googlecloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:40 | by ThaDafinser