User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PPC Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/536.29.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.4 Safari/536.29.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 6.0.4OS X Lion 10.7Webkit 536.29.13desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0.4closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0.4closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.0.4closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0.4closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0.4WebKit 536.29.13Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 6.0.4Webkit 536.29.13OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.7.5Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:40 | by ThaDafinser