User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chedot Chrome/43.0.2345.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Chedot 43.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chedot 43.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.206 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2345closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2345.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 43.0.2345.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:39 | by ThaDafinser