User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40/3.0FP1; Nokia5300/04.70; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/0.8.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 0.8Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia5300smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 04.70;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 5300close Nokia5300closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 0.8.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 0.8.3Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5300closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 0.8.3Gecko Series40 Nokia5300 XpressMusicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.8closeNokia Series 40 NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:38 | by ThaDafinser