User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-B3410-Bouygues/B3410XXIL2 NetFront/3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-B3410-Bouygues Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.062 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-B3410-Bouygues B3410XXIL2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungGT B3410mobile-browseryescloseclose0.178 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront SamsungGT-B3410smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT-B3410-Bouyguescloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 Touchwiz SamsungStar Qwertymobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT B3410Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:38 | by ThaDafinser