User agent detail

Midori/0.2 (X11; Linux; U; c) WebKit/534.7+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.2Linux Webkit 534.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Midori 0.2WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.2WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.2WebKit 534.7Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.2Webkit 534.7Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:38 | by ThaDafinser