User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; Edition IBIS) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.11Windows XPPresto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.11closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.11Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.11closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.11closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.11closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.388Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.364 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.388Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:38 | by ThaDafinser