User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 95) Opera 6.01 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Opera 6.01Win95 95unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 6.01Presto Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.01closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.01Presto Windows 95desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.01closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.1closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.01closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.1 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 6.01 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:37 | by ThaDafinser