User agent detail

Opera/9.00 (Nintendo Wii; U; ; 1038-58; Wii Internet Channel/1.0; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NintendoWii Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.00Presto 2.0 NintendoWiiConsoleyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.00closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.00Presto Nintendo WiiNintendoWiiconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.0close NintendoWiicloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Channel Presto NintendoNintendo Wiicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.00 NintendoWiigaming:consolecloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.00closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWiiSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:37 | by ThaDafinser