User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux ppc64; rv:37.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/37.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 37.0Fedora Gecko 37.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 37.0Gecko 37.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 37.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 37.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 37.0Gecko Fedora desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 37.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 37.0closeFedora closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 37.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 37.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 37.0Gecko 37.0Fedora desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 37.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.054 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:37 | by ThaDafinser