User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; ru; GT-S5233T) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5233T Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 SamsungGT-S5233Tsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close SamsungGT-S5233Tcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.326 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.05001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:36 | by ThaDafinser