User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (FreeBSD; U; Viera; xx) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera/1.5.2 Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1/CE-HTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Viera Browser 1.5.2 Webkit 535.1PanasonicVieratelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SmartViera 1.5WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicViera TVTV Device0.073 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 14.0WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicSmart TVtv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 14.0.835closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202WebKit 535.1FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Viera Browser 1.5.2Webkit 535.1 PanasonicVieratelevisioncloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:36 | by ThaDafinser