User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 3.0.1; LG-V905R Build/HRI66) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.63780
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Opera 16.0.1212.63780Android 3.0.1Blink LGV905Rtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.1 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.63780closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.63780closeAndroid 3.0.1GenericAndroid 3.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Android 3.0LGV905Rtabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.63780closeAndroid 3.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 3.0.1LGV905Rcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.2 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.63780WebKit 537.36Android 3.0.1LGLGV905Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Android 3.0.1LGOptimus G-Slatetabletyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.63780closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 3.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:36 | by ThaDafinser