User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.65 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Chrome 29.0MacOSX 10.6unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeOS X 10.6.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Mac 10.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeMac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.65WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.464 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 29.0.1547.76closeMac OS X 10.8.3Desktopcloseclose0.056 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:35 | by ThaDafinser