User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SM-B780A/1.0 NetFront/4.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
NetFront 4.2 SamsungRugby 4mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.2NetFront JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SM-B780A 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.2closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.2NetFront SamsungSM-B780Asmartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.2close SamsungSM-B780Acloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 4.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.141 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.2 SamsungRugby 4mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:35 | by ThaDafinser