User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-CN; HTC J Butterfly Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.0.321 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCJ Butterfly Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.113 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.321closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 4.1HTCJ Butterflysmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCJ Butterflycloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.321WebKit 534.31Android 4.1.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.592 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 4.1.1HTCJ Butterflymobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:34 | by ThaDafinser