User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; YTONE L985S Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/33.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
Chrome Mobile 33.0.0.0Android 4.4.4Blink YtoneL985Ssmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.4YtoneL985Ssmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4YTONE L985Scloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 33Blink Android 4.4.4YTONE L985Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.09501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:34 | by ThaDafinser