User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.1; zh-cn; BOWAY_V95Pro Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.1 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
QQ Browser 6.1Android 5.1WebKit BowayV95Prosmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.138 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.3 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 6.1WebKit Android 5.1BowayV95Prosmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.1closeAndroid 5.1BOWAY_V95Procloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 6.1WebKit 537.36Android 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 6.1Webkit 537.36Android 5.1BOWAY_V95Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.14702 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:34 | by ThaDafinser