User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Apple Mail 4.3iOS 4.3unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail 4.3WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.17.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 4.3.5AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPadtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 4.3.5closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 4.3.5AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533.17.9iOS 4.3.5AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.423 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.17.9iOS 4.3.5AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.3.5AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:34 | by ThaDafinser