User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; en-US; F600 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.2.0.535 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.2Android 4.1unknown FlyingF600Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.2U3 Android 4.1FlyingF600Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.249 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.2WebKit Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.2.0closeAndroid 4.1.2F600closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.2.0.535WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.2Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2FlyingF600mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:33 | by ThaDafinser