User agent detail

Nokia7230/5.0 (05.71) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-145.php
Nokia Browser 0.0JAVA unknownunknown Nokia7230Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser WebKit JAVA Nokia7230Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia7230smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia7230closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 7230closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.478 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia7230mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia7230Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:33 | by ThaDafinser