User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; XBLWP7; ZuneWP7)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
IEMobile 9.0WinPhone7.5 7.55.0 5.0unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 9.0Trident 5.0WinPhone7.5 7.5Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows 6.1GenericWindows Phone 7.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 9.0Trident Windows Phone yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Large Screen 9.0closeWindows Phone closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 9.0Trident 5.0 Windows Phone 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0Windows Phone 7.5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 9(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:33 | by ThaDafinser