User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/8.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3; Tablet PC 2.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-875.php
IE 12.0Win10 10.08.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 12.0Trident 8.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows 10desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.112 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 8.0Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.427 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 8.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:33 | by ThaDafinser